Publication in Annals of Oncology

Does acetaminophen blunt cancer immunotherapy? Plasma evidence links paracetamol to worse checkpoint-inhibitor outcomes

Impact of acetaminophen on the efficacy of immunotherapy in cancer patients
JournalAnnals of Oncology
DateMay 2022
Read full paper →

Acetaminophen (paracetamol) is the default painkiller in advanced cancer and is widely assumed to be immunologically harmless — but it already carries a warning around vaccination, where it blunts antibody responses. This study asked whether it also undercuts immune checkpoint blockade. Across three independent cohorts of patients on checkpoint inhibitors, those with detectable acetaminophen in plasma had worse survival, independent of other prognostic factors. Mouse models, human immune-cell assays, and high-throughput plasma profiling traced the effect to a mechanism: acetaminophen expands immunosuppressive regulatory T cells and raises IL-10. The practical message is direct — acetaminophen should be used cautiously in patients on immunotherapy.

This original article in Annals of Oncology, co-first-authored by Dr. Alban Bessede (Explicyte) and Dr. Aurélien Marabelle (Gustave Roussy) and led by Prof. Antoine Italiano, tested whether acetaminophen (APAP, paracetamol) — the first-line analgesic in advanced cancer — impairs the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockers. The team combined three clinical cohorts (the phase 3 CheckMate 025 trial in renal cell carcinoma, and the institutional profiling programs BIP at Institut Bergonié and PREMIS at Gustave Roussy) with a preclinical MC38 tumor model and human immune-cell studies. The work was supported by the Conseil Régional Nouvelle-Aquitaine, Fondation Bergonié, Explicyte, and Gustave Roussy. Explicyte anchored the biomarker and immune-profiling work — plasma metabolomics to detect acetaminophen exposure, Olink plasma proteomics, high-parameter flow-cytometry immunophenotyping of patient and donor blood, and the in vitro functional assays — that turned a clinical correlation into a mechanism.

The question

Does acetaminophen, the standard analgesic in advanced cancer, reduce the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade — and if so, how?

Key steps

  1. 1

    Detect acetaminophen exposure objectively in plasma

    Because self-reported acetaminophen use is unreliable, Explicyte measured the drug and its metabolite acetaminophen-glucuronide directly in plasma by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, rather than trusting medical records. This was applied to the BIP cohort (untargeted metabolomics, 34 patients) and the PREMIS cohort (quantitative dosing, 297 patients), and paired with re-analysis of public serum metabolomics from 297 renal-cancer patients in CheckMate 025.

  2. 2

    Exposure tracked with worse outcomes across three cohorts

    In CheckMate 025, detectable acetaminophen at treatment onset predicted worse overall survival. In BIP, acetaminophen-exposed patients had an objective response rate of 0% versus 29.4% (P = 0.015). In PREMIS, they had shorter progression-free survival (median 2.63 vs 5.03 months, P = 0.009) and overall survival (median 8.43 vs 14.93 months, P < 0.0001), and on multivariate analysis acetaminophen remained independently associated with both PFS (HR 1.43, P = 0.015) and OS (HR 1.78, P = 0.006).

  3. 3

    A regulatory-T-cell mechanism, shown in vivo and in vitro

    In the PD-1/PD-L1-responsive MC38 colon model, adding non-toxic acetaminophen to checkpoint blockade lowered tumor rejection (P = 0.045) and increased tumor-infiltrating regulatory T cells. In human PBMC assays run by Explicyte, acetaminophen sharply cut the nivolumab-driven, anti-CD3–induced interferon-γ response. High-parameter flow cytometry of healthy donors given 4 g of acetaminophen over 24 hours showed Treg expansion enriched for the suppressive LAG3/TIM3 phenotype, plus expansion of dendritic cells overexpressing the immunosuppressive enzymes IDO1 and arginase.

  4. 4

    Plasma proteomics confirmed the suppressive signature in patients

    Using the Olink Target 96 Inflammation panel (92 proteins) on PREMIS plasma, Explicyte found that IL-10 — a central mediator of Treg-driven suppression — and Flt3-ligand, a dendritic-cell growth factor, were significantly upregulated on checkpoint blockade exclusively in patients taking acetaminophen, linking the clinical signal to a measurable immunosuppressive program.

Impact

The study reframes a ubiquitous, "harmless" supportive-care drug as a potential confounder of immunotherapy — with a defined mechanism and a simple, measurable biomarker.

0% vs 29%
objective response rate in acetaminophen-exposed vs acetaminophen-free patients (BIP cohort; P = 0.015)
8.4 vs 14.9 mo
median overall survival, acetaminophen-detectable vs acetaminophen-free (PREMIS; P < 0.0001)
HR 1.78
independent association of plasma acetaminophen with worse overall survival on multivariate analysis (P = 0.006)

For oncologists and trialists, the immediate takeaway is caution: concurrent acetaminophen may erode the benefit of checkpoint inhibitors and could confound immunotherapy trial results if not tracked. Because self-report is unreliable, objective plasma measurement of acetaminophen is the credible way to capture exposure — and plasma acetaminophen becomes a candidate stratification variable. For drug developers, the Treg/IL-10 mechanism suggests concomitant medications deserve systematic pharmacodynamic monitoring, and that antipyretic use is a variable worth pre-specifying rather than ignoring.

Need objective drug-exposure metabolomics, Olink proteomics, or high-parameter immune monitoring to find hidden confounders in your immunotherapy trial? Let's talk.

Talk to us
Explicyte Oncology CRO logo

Capabilities

Modalities