Publication in Cell Reports Medicine

Why do some mature-TLS lung cancers resist immunotherapy? Two CAF subsets that drive primary resistance in NSCLC

Spatial transcriptomics reveal the determinants of resistance to immunotherapy in NSCLC patients with mature TLS
JournalCell Reports Medicine
DateFeb 2025
Read full paper →

Mature tertiary lymphoid structures (mTLS) usually flag the lung cancers most likely to respond to checkpoint inhibitors — yet a large share of mTLS-positive patients never benefit, and why stayed unclear. Across an ICI-treated NSCLC cohort of 509 patients, spatial transcriptomics and multiplex immunofluorescence traced primary resistance to the tumor stroma: two cancer-associated fibroblast subsets, FAP+αSMA+ and MYH11+αSMA+, that drive CD8 T-cell exhaustion and regulatory T-cell infiltration. Both point to stromal biomarkers and targets to rescue immunotherapy.

Published in Cell Reports Medicine, this translational study was led by first author Florent Peyraud, MD — work carried out during his PhD at Explicyte — under the supervision of Prof. Antoine Italiano (Institut Bergonié and Gustave Roussy) and Alban Bessede, PhD (Explicyte). It draws on pre-treatment FFPE samples from the Bergonié Institute Profiling (BIP) precision-medicine study (NCT02534649) and was made possible through the imCORE Network collaboration supported by Roche/Genentech. Explicyte ran the spatial transcriptomic profiling (NanoString GeoMx Whole Transcriptome Atlas), the multiplex immunofluorescence and digital-pathology work — including TLS maturity scoring and the CAF, T-cell-exhaustion, and regulatory-T-cell panels — the regional transcriptomic profiling, and the supporting computational analyses that anchored the findings.

The question

Why do many NSCLC patients with mature tertiary lymphoid structures — normally a marker of likely immunotherapy benefit — still fail to respond to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade?

Key steps

  1. 1

    Validate mTLS as a predictive marker at cohort scale

    Explicyte performed the pathology-based TLS scoring and digital-pathology analysis across 509 ICI-treated NSCLC patients from the BIP study, using CD3/CD20/CD23 multiplex IHC on the Ventana Discovery platform with PhenoImager HT imaging to separate mature from immature TLS. mTLS were present in 28.7% of cases and predicted markedly better outcomes — 56.8% response vs 33.6%, median OS 28.4 vs 14.5 months, median PFS 10.8 vs 4.5 months (all p < 0.001) — independent of PD-L1 expression and genomic features.

  2. 2

    Trace resistance to the stroma with spatial transcriptomics

    Using the NanoString GeoMx Whole Transcriptome Atlas on six mTLS-positive tumors from patients with extreme responses (three responders, three with progressive disease), Explicyte profiled TLS, tumor, and stromal compartments separately via CD45/PanCK segmentation. Differential expression localized the responder/non-responder split to the stroma: non-responders showed fibroblast enrichment (p < 0.001) and elevated TGF-β and epithelial-mesenchymal transition signaling, while responders were marked by IFN-α and IFN-γ inflammatory pathways.

  3. 3

    Pinpoint two CAF subsets by multiplex immunofluorescence

    A 5-plex mIF panel (PanCK/CD8/FAP/MYH11/αSMA) across 77 patient samples quantified FAP+αSMA+ and MYH11+αSMA+ cancer-associated fibroblasts. Both subsets were denser in the stroma of non-responders: high FAP+αSMA+ CAF density corresponded to 57.6% non-responders vs 27.8% (p = 0.027) and shorter PFS (HR 0.35; 95% CI 0.17–0.72; p = 0.003), with a parallel pattern for MYH11+αSMA+ CAF (56.5% vs 36.4%, p = 0.038; PFS HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.16–0.79; p = 0.008).

  4. 4

    Link each CAF subset to a distinct immune-evasion route

    Regional transcriptomic profiling of 40 mTLS-positive tumors plus mIF exhaustion and regulatory-T-cell panels on 64 patients separated the two mechanisms. FAP+αSMA+ CAF-high tumors carried inflammatory (IFN-α/IFN-γ) signatures and CD8 T-cell exhaustion, with denser intratumoral CD8+PD1+ cells co-expressing CD39, LAG3, TIGIT, and TIM3. MYH11+αSMA+ CAF-high tumors instead showed regulatory T-cell enrichment, with more stromal CD4+FoxP3+ cells expressing TIGIT and ICOS and a higher Treg-to-CD8 ratio.

Impact

The work reframes primary resistance in mTLS-positive NSCLC as a stromal problem — and names two specific fibroblast populations behind it, each with its own immunosuppressive signature.

509
ICI-treated NSCLC patients profiled — the largest TLS-focused lung cancer cohort reported to date
56.8% vs 33.6%
ICI response rate, mTLS-positive vs mTLS-negative tumors (p < 0.001)
28.4 vs 14.5 mo
median overall survival, mTLS-positive vs mTLS-negative (p < 0.001)

For drug developers, the two CAF subsets are candidate stratification biomarkers and stromal targets: flagging mTLS-positive patients whose tumors are nonetheless fibroblast-rich could redirect them away from ICI monotherapy toward combination strategies. Because FAP+αSMA+ CAFs map to CD8 exhaustion and MYH11+αSMA+ CAFs to Treg infiltration, the data support pairing checkpoint blockade with exhaustion- or Treg-directed agents — the rationale behind the upcoming INDIGO trial of atezolizumab plus the anti-TIGIT tiragolumab in PD-L1-low mTLS-positive NSCLC.

Profiling stromal CAF subsets or TLS maturity to explain immunotherapy resistance? Let's talk.

Talk to us
Explicyte Oncology CRO logo

Capabilities

Modalities